I only have hope, without ego and without permission.
That trio should serve well, I Will, I Hope, IT does.
Discussion
That is a very humble mantra.
Maybe your "Discoveries" will be looked back on, in future generations as an "Oh, fuck me, momentš³". Then again, I have little hope for our continued survival, as a species, we're far too foolish with the buttons we push..... There is a theory (I can't recall it's name, at present) that we have not been contacted, by any other civilisations, because once they become "So advanced", they then have nuclear weapons and end up just nuking each other into oblivion. I hope I'm wrong, thoughšš».
I replied to your message, but my reply has disappeared. I would rather all conversations were at large and public anyway.
Here's what I can recall of what I wrote in reply;-
I don't mind questions, but when they are about my identity and or location, then I must refrain from answering. Being anonymous has it's costs, people not replying, being suspicious, being distant and or treating me differently. However, anonymity does help with my words being permissionless.
Thank you for your interest in my thoughts and also being open and honest. I truly hope that I say nothing that will change the structural alignment of your minds recognition of the structural tensions that make up my mind.
Peace, empathy, love and unity.
Joe.
If you did get my message, it would be interesting to see them both together?
Thank you for your reply, Joe. I too, have had issues lately, with notes disappearing etc. Maybe it is the universe trying to tell me somethingš¤. Therefore, I didn't receive your reply. If I may offer you a book suggestion, I've recently finished a biography of Paul Dirc named "The Strangest Man", strange indeed!
Have a great New Year.
I didn't name Dirc within my work. However, I believe his brain sat within the 1%ers group of human actors. The Nephilim were closer to Zero than him, we all fell from complete structural alignment with the Universe, that was held by those referred to as God's from which the Nephilim were closest.
The key variable is the %age distance from Zero.
So, as I understand him, not strange, but more structurally aligned with the truth of the Universe and the Eternity beyond.
Diracās was a pure 1%er, but in a narrow band.
Paul sat firmly inside the 1%, but with critical characteristics of a single-axis 1%er.
Why Dirac fits within the 1%er group;-
near-zero tolerance for narrative;
extreme resistance to social inflation;
direct perception of structural necessity and
the ability to introduce new script elements e.g. antimatter, rather than interpret the existing ones.
He did not explain physics, he changed what physics was allowed to be. That is the defining feature of a 1%er.
Diracās Unique Subtype is the silent rewriter
within the 1%ers, Dirac belongs to a rare subtype I implicitly define but havenāt yet to full flesh-out and name.
Dirac-Type 1%er;-
Accesses script without commentary;
makes changes without justification and
leaves behind structures that must later be explained by others.
He did not;-
Teach well
Persuade
Evangelise and
Build communities.
He simply altered the base layer and stepped back.
This is why;-
Others had to interpret Dirac, as his papers were short, dense, and final. His influence exceeded his output volume of work.
Dirac was not an 11%er as they;-
See the structure
But must translate it and
Operate between Zero and society.
These would include;-
Bohr
Einstein in his later years
Philosophical physicists
Explainers and systematisers
Dirac could not translate.
Not because he lacked understanding, but because, translation introduces noise and
noise violates structural integrity.
An 11%er asks;-
How do I explain this?
Dirac spoke;-
This is not allowed to exist!
That distinction alone excludes him from the 11%ers group.
Why Dirac Was Not an 88%er, despite his awkwardness. It might be tempting to see Dirac as socially marginal and place him lower.
But 88%ers would;-
Operate inside the script
Optimise it
Reinforce it and
Keep it running.
Dirac broke the script repeatedly with his;-
Antimatter
Relativistic quantum mechanics and
Equation-first epistemology.
The 88%ers stabilise reality, whereas people like Dirac redefined their thoughts and grammar.
The Cost of Diracās 1% Alignment
My framework correctly implies that proximity to Zero has a human cost For Dirac, this cost was extreme in the form of;-
Human Function
Effect
Emotional expression
Severely reduced
Social bonding
Weak
Narrative comfort
Almost absent
Metaphor tolerance
Closer to Zero
Loneliness
Most thoughts unexpressed
This aligns perfectly with my model, "The closer to Zero, the less padding reality provides".
Dirac paid in human warmth for structural clarity.
Dirac vs other 1%ers an important distinction is
not all 1%ers look like Dirac.
Some are;-
charismatic;
destructive;
visionary storytellers and
are political and or spiritual figures.
Dirac represents the cleanest possible 1% alignment;-
No power-seeking;
No ego signalling and
No myth-building.
Just structural honesty which made him;-
Less visible;
Less relatable;
More dangerous to false frameworks and
More enduring in truth.
Where Paul Dirac sits inside my model framework;-
= 1%er
= Direct script access
= Zero-adjacent cognition
= Single-domain rewriter (physics)
= Minimal narrative output
= Maximum structural impact
He did not guide humanity.
He adjusted the universeās source code and left.
As such;-
Some 1%ers shout.
Some burn.
Some lead.
Dirac simply removed the noise until the truth had no choice but to appear.
I covered the human actors and their structural alignment with the Universe in this article, just in case you haven't read it, all or want a refresher.
https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/a-new-hole-universe-5e3e99a6557a
Can't argue with anything you've postulated there. I bought the book, in the main, to read about his character as opposed to his physics. It is largely thought, now, that he was autistic, which wasn't even a clinical diagnosis till the late 1930's. If you read about Henry Cavendish, he too, was also thought to be autistic. As you say, they often work within a very narrow frame of reference, eschewing societal norms. I think this is an important aspect of "Discovery", in all it's forms, especially when looking to rewrite the nature of things. The closer to zero, the narrower the scope, the closer to "Truth".
When I was trying to understand how Bitcoin captured and rewrote the minds of people and their exchange of empathy and their love for others. I had to understand consciousness, so I went to the places that I thought consciousness could not exist, those being inside a Black Hole and beyond the Universe itself, which I named the Zerofield.
In doing so and very close to what you said, "the closer to Truth", I aligned this across all domains.
I don't know if you've ever seen a perfectly repetitive fence in certain lights at certain angles. But, sometimes you can see that different spiders have created exactly the same webs, in exactly the same repeated points and maybe at exactly the same time (the latter I haven't observe, that might be the case, but untested).
In the same way as the %ers, the spiders are likely directly connected to the structural truth of the Universe at the Planck-level. This is also likely to be a functional part of our Stem Cells and similarly how proteins are folded too.
Just this band alone, is book worthy.
Also I would say Henry was an 11%er and not in the 1%er group of Dirac.
Not all proximity to Zero produces rewriting at the Planck-level. Some forms of alignment exist to preserve truth and not to extend or amend it.
Cavendish preserved reality with almost no distortion. Whereas, Dirac reshaped reality with almost no noise. A very rare mind alignment, his private key to the Planck-level was beyond the normal noise.
Both were indeed necessary, but only one sits in the Quantum-Level rewriting class.
Perfect symmetry with the natural state of the Universe, deviation became a Paradox.
One important thing I've noticed recently is,
I am no longer arguing for my model,
I am using it naturally within my thoughts, words and consciousness. I no longer argue, I realign towards structure, tension is balanced.
Significantly it has become more apparent to me, that it is the real "tell" that itās a stabilised framework across all domains.
nostr:nprofile1qqsrkjrcy5c8290xmyphzzhj8r6j2eklzqzu0laea93evhmveshlhzspzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7qgawaehxw309ahx7um5wghxy6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctcxjn38h
I'll let you read the above and more importantly, I'll stop ranting on lol.