Bitcoin is becoming increasingly inaccessible to the rest of the world because blockspace is being used for everything and anything other than transactions. I'm aware that competition for blockspace is a free market, but the more people are priced out of sending a transaction then how the fuck is Bitcoin 'freedom' money at all.

People say things like, oh, there's layer-2, but now we see that custodial layer 2 is getting shut down.

The people that need Bitcoin the most aren't going to be able to run a self custodial lightning node, and now there is the possibility that they won't be able to use Bitcoin in any meaningful way due to blockspace congestion because bitcoin is being used as a fucking database for every fucking shitcoin in town.

Sorry man, I'm wound up af.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I would need to read the product spec to be sure on this, however in the absence of the details, I would expect he would do something similar to Peter Todds Open Time Stamps project. ie use a single on-chain transaction to consolidate many multiples of DID information. A bit like transaction batching.

In that way, the layer-1 footprint of the project would be very insignificant.

That may be so, but why is he attempting to solve this problem using Bitcoin? Everyday now, I see Bitcoin being used for something other than it's original usecase.

Now I'm a layperson, not a coder, so forgive me if the subtle nuances escape me, but this begs the question : 'Is Bitcoin deviating from it's original mission?'

It's the ownly truly decentralised digital infastructure that we have.

If he was to build it on Ethereum and claim that it was decentralised, he would have been just as well to have Klaus Schwab code him something up, instead.

I think there's a paralell here with the argument around Bitcoins energy use...

Most bitcoiners make the case that using all of the electricity is worth it, because of the benefits truely hard money confers on society.

Equally, most bitcoiners make the case that 1 decentralised blockchain is enough.

By the same token, if the world is to have decentralised identity [and we can debate this, as a seperate issue], then perhaps the cost of a transaction or two, per block, is worth it....

What does this thing do that pgp doesn't?

I'll admit that I don't fully understand it.

I'm not sure.

Another thought I had was, why not just use Nostr public keys...

🤷‍♂️

🤔

Appreciate your insight btw, just to be explicitly amicable.