I was thinking abour wikipedia on nostr - Nostrpedia - i'm sure someone have thought about it or created it. Long forms can be used as it can be edited.

To a user, it becomes a link that a lot of people refer to for information. To Nostr it becomes a form of marketing as well as these links will often be googled up and shared. It can also generate secondary jobs for people who want to edit information, be Nostrpedia writers etc

Not sure if this is along your train of thoughts on the above.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

IMO wikipedia is out. LLMs are in.

LLMs can generate info, but there are differences between using them and a source like wiki. Wiki is a visible repository of information - users can find a wide range of topics from early childhood to experience to recognition at a quick glance. Wiki has10B views per month and I doubt it would be dying anytime soon.

LLMs on the other hand function more as search contributors. Users prompt queries to generate information. But LLMs can be customized to provide wiki-like profiles, tailoring model's responses. Many people are customizing LLMs for various applications, and turning that into startups

Search in general is out.

💯