I’m conflicted.
On one hand, Saifedean’s exhibits classic dunning-Kruger qualities: relying his expertise in one specific niche to validate (obviously misplaced) “mastery” of other areas of study.
On the other hand, I grew up in USA, where things are far from perfect, but the gov/financial system is nowhere near as bad as Lebanon. I recognize that privilege. And so I can understand why someone in a hyper-inflationary environment would argue that gov’t officials and financial “leaders” are unilaterally corrupt.
The world is nuanced, and so are my opinions. As a result, it requires mental and emotional processing to begin “sorting” these conflicts and my opinions thereof.