Fuck podcasts.

nostr:nevent1qqsfsm9dq4v7effdzn9zghv6uqu6q4lujcft4vkr0shdcwj8p4rx0zspzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsygp57x42dv2s3hst4vlssmzt6kaa0dg0skv528rwdzkf2h7gxm3u6cpsgqqqqqqs3hm4t4

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:npub1vwymuey3u7mf860ndrkw3r7dz30s0srg6tqmhtjzg7umtm6rn5eq2qzugd come get your boy 😂

Lolllllllll 🤣 love nunya pod 💜🤙🙏

#yestr and thank you!

?cid=2154d3d76x7phsv1rf64gsku50y38by45bxlabwntckpxtiq&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

What if the podcast is literally reading Hayek, Rothbard, Sowell and many other authors *to you*?

Huh, what about that?

?cid=2154d3d7m7bg1j4n4hhikaqyde1zeoz0lgmine8pdqgfcb9w&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

Decent compromise.

Audio books biggest shortcoming is that they aren't on podcasting platforms. The format is much better UX, and bigger reach. Innovate, or perish.

If you add some up to date discussion and bitcoiner's pow commentary, that's a great added value. But most of the time, re-reading out loud the content could be eliminated if they come up with better distribution models.

See Legalman’s “the Quash” podcast where he reads LYSANDER SPOONER to you

So good

Personally? I'd prefer reading.

But if that's what others are comfortable with, sure.

What matters is the depth that a book can deliver.