I think you and I are talking about different things. You are talking about consistencies we choose to accept on different levels (stop signs on a local community level, nostr between you and I, ect.) I am referring truth, specifically that no one person can prove that their reality is truth because you can never know if some other entity has experienced the same moment in a way that opposes your logic. You don’t know what you don’t know and we sure as hell can’t see into the future yet so you never know if everything completely changes tomorrow, instantly your prior truth becomes untrue. Anyway if no one person can know that their reality is truth I think it is funny that we think if we get enough people together saying the same thing it now becomes truth, I just see this as voluntary acceptance of a consistency that we have noticed to date (but can still change in the future as our understanding science and physics often does).

I know none of what I am talking about has any tangible value that can be acted on, but I do think this framing should lead to a little more humility and open-mindedness…….and unending questioning which I think is good.

Keeps life interesting, when there is never a finish line. There is always more progress and possibilities.