What do you think the implications of his statement are?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I thought that is already articulated in the post. Did you read it?

Tbf the post does require prior knowledge of which specific aspects of the call were interesting; without which it may sound ordinary. I did however provide additional information

Good question, the personal testimony of the caller in question, traumatised as he may have been, matches what numerous eyewitnesses (including firefighters present on the day) have described ie explosions being responsible for the collapse of the buildings, pointing to the fact that they were planted prior to the towers being hit. Furthermore the cars surrounding the towers exploding also suggests the use of DEWs. Check out the link below and the videos as well which corroborate the caller’s account.

https://youtu.be/4M193hUIhuU?si=aHSgHpQ3ERED2oqd

https://blossom.primal.net/eaa0fae9db6c1eb3ae95a0feb1ac5055a2b80e55da80bbc2daae14d613a1c856.mp4

https://blossom.primal.net/c2aaf6909f7227e9b46123699b40374c9220bc1c99184fcb5fe2d773d627e277.mp4

Interesting, thank you for sharing.

The pleasure is all mine 🤝