This is a PR piece which doesn't refute or debunk anything that the documentary discussed. I highly recommend you watch the documentary for yourself before you start spreading propaganda from the white coats. The real limitations of the study are discussed in the film, so i recommend you watch it unless you are a propagandist yourself

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What’s it called?

The documentary?

Yes plz

It's called an inconvenient study, Link below :-)

https://youtu.be/rSXUqAXmw-A?si=n57eZJkS1ylkw2xy

Nah I'm good.

I'm an actual scientist and know how to interpret study results and validate if the data was misinterpreted or not for myself.

I saw the paper and would not trust them to even pop a zit.

I highly recommend YOU stop spreading misinformation.

You are a propagandist masquerading as a scientist. I read the paper, I too know how to interpret data and i saw the doccie as well. Unlike you, i am willing to look at both sides of the story, not be led by personal bias.

I'm not the one sharing blatant misinformation.

Just calling it out.

I do see both sides and while a broken clock can be right twice a day this ain't it🤷

Ok dude

ACKCHYUAL SCIENTIST 😂😂