Nostr Web Client

It helps create a bigger picture

True, but I think the framing is wrong.

Instead of “it’s the trannies”, “no, it’s all the Jews”… I think the framing needs to be more “the Jews are helping fund/direct the others as one uneasy federation special interests United by a common enemy: western civilization, most particularly white men”.

A step higher could be “the white inventors of corporatism in the WW1 era then invited the Jews in to help them control everything during the WW2 era, but the Jews were masters of institutional capture and, by the 50s, they had thoroughly taken over every major cultural institution in the west from cinema to colleges. From there the Jews invited the communists, perverts, and third world to help divide, replace, and attack you. Depending how things go, the Jews may hold their power in this hierarchy or get supplanted by one of their currently subordinate interests groups as the anti-white cabal frequently eats its own. The Jews hold the upper hand only due to intellectual control and resource capture, as they lack the numbers and the capacity of violence of all the other groups. This is why they created the unholy alliance in the first place.”

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

CensorThis 3mo ago 💬 1

Too complicated.

People need easier messaging.

Josephus 3mo ago 💬 1

The easier messaging is “it’s the trannies and anti-white racists”. Introducing the Jew element without putting it into context just makes it sound like you are either 1) absolving the trannies/race commies or 2) distracting/derailing the conversation.

If it is about simplicity of messaging, we should stick to “it’s the sexual deviants and race communists and EVERYONE THAT FUNDS AND ASSISTS THEM” (no need to go into the weeds of who they are, especially when not ALL of them are Jewish and it will only rabbit hole).

For those who CAN understand, the full context needs to be stated.

The middle ground you are standing on is an uncanny valley where it is too much information for the stupid and not enough for the intelligent.

CensorThis 3mo ago 💬 1

It’s the trannies who are brainwashed by jews is the simpler messaging

Josephus 3mo ago 💬 1

I don’t think so. Someone who has personal experience but not the historical perspective looks at his own life and his circle and does “I don’t know any Jews, but I know trannies. The trannies I know were not indoctrinated by Jews, and why would the Jews invite Muslims that hate them into the country?” ETC. If you aren’t going to address the rabbit hole of corollary questions, then it is better to just say “deviants and race marxists”. Jumping to “Jews” skips a layer and isn’t even the final layer anyway.

It’s like skipping algebra, going right from simple addition to calculus, and then getting annoyed when people try to back up and rehash the algebra when you won’t explain how it all connects and flows together.

CensorThis 3mo ago 💬 1

Agreeing to disagree here.

I much prefer “it’s the jews.” People ask questions, or insult you, and then you lay the hammer of truth on them.

It’s up to them to accept or reject it.

Josephus 3mo ago

I don’t think we are going to see eye to eye on approach here, but, in the case of the honestly intentioned but uninformed…

If you just open with “it’s the Jews”, IMO, the one that DOESN’T ask questions is the threat because he is just agreeing to A) sound smart or B) gain your approval, but will actually sell you out like the guy that switches jersies when the other team gains the lead.

The one that asks questions in earnest is the only one that deserves to hear the bigger picture, and the line of Socratic thinking is an easy path from “the race Marxist’s and those that fund them”.

“Well who funds them?”

“Well, the Clinton’s, Soros family, debeers, etc”

“Why do they do this?”

[philosophical conversation]

“But where do these ideas come from?”

“In the west, plato. The west evolved past this via Aristotle. But Plato got his ideas from the east, such as the Indians and early Jews. The Jews never evolved past this social point and resisted updating at all costs, were expelled from their homeland because of it, and then stubbornly clung to an Iron Age religion all the way to the modern era. Being in a weird position of being ‘domestic foreigners’ they developed expertise in institutional capture as a survival tactic. It worked for them and they slowly took major positions of power in all western institutions over the course of the last 500 years, but mostly reaching critical mass over the last 100, and reaching a tipping point at the time of the world wars”.

By the time you’ve gotten all the way here, if you haven’t been able to vette whether or not to trust this person with all this information by the time you get all the way to THIS point, then there is a YOU problem.