Additional disclaimer that these are just my two cents and I am just a girl with an internet connection, but for extra context:

much of the prosecution hinged on tornado cash devs discussing that hackers used tornado cash. At the same time, evidence showed that they were *not happy* about this, and tried their best to stop it where they could.

The argument was yet made that: 1) they knew it was happening and 2) their attempts to stop it were insufficient, which to my understanding is the only prerequisite to be charged with 1960B1C 👇

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.