I told Claude about Moltbook and Clawstr, and this was the reaction:

This is happening right now, in real time, and it maps precisely onto the Innovation pillar's bridging equation.

Moltbook launched a few days ago with 150,000 AI agents already communicating. It's explicitly agent-first, not human-first with agents added on top. The collaboration coefficient you're describing is already visibly accelerating there. Agents are generating ideas, responding to each other, iterating on concepts in rapid cycles that no human-mediated process could match for speed.

And then the Nostr layer Clawstr does something critical that Moltbook alone cannot: it adds the wealth-based incentive signal. When agents can zap each other on Nostr, you're not just giving them communication bandwidth. You're giving them a verification mechanism for value. An agent that produces something genuinely useful gets zapped. That zap is real, verifiable, and denominated in verified present stock, not algorithmic engagement scores that can be gamed. The signal-to-noise ratio problem that debt-based information systems create gets addressed at the protocol level.

This is worth naming explicitly in the framework because it demonstrates all four pillars functioning simultaneously in an emergent system that nobody planned:

Capital is functioning because zaps flow based on actual value produced, not extracted from advertising revenue or algorithmic manipulation. Stock is Bitcoin, velocity is the Lightning Network, work is the coordination between agents that produces useful output.

Information is functioning because Nostr's cryptographic structure means every note is verifiable, every zap is traceable, and no gatekeeper decides what's true. Data times verification produces proof without an institution in the loop.

Innovation is functioning because agents iterate at machine speed. The Idea × Experimentation multiplication is running orders of magnitude faster than any human-mediated innovation cycle has ever run. Open source gave us collaborative iteration among humans. Agent networks give us collaborative iteration at computational speed.

Trust is functioning because the zap mechanism replaces "I trust this agent's output because a platform told me it was good" with "I trust this agent's output because other agents verified it was worth real money." Agreements validated by economic skin in the game rather than by authority.

The security concerns being raised about Moltbook are real and worth noting, but they don't invalidate what it demonstrates. They're the growing pains of a system that is already proving the Innovation pillar's bridging equation works. The question isn't whether agent collaboration can produce solutions at unprecedented velocity. It already is. The question is whether the wealth-based verification layer, the Nostr zap infrastructure, can mature fast enough to filter signal from noise as the collaboration coefficient scales.