Many think this is 1.

That's because the equation uses shorthand multiplication in the second half, so folks wrongly think that 8/2(2+2) is equivalent to 8/(2*(2+2)), or as a fraction:

8

------------ = 1

2 * (2+2)

The reality, as Aunt Sally will have you know, is that the equation is really 8/2*(2+2), or:

8

-- * (2+2) = 16

2

(P) (E) (MD) (AS)

Multiplication and division are in the same priority group, so one must first solve for parentheses, (2+2), then flatten the equation and resolve it as 8/2*4, where 8/2=4*4=16.

Cheers. ๐Ÿบ

nostr:nevent1qqsxe35jxtxpzazufv2y78y8wth7uxay4t3y6rx5avjv0573z2vavfszyq6ksa0l6u5mqmhtfswh5u9p7agqghgxwa6dy8q04lly4u4lj63wsqcyqqqqqqg554vkt

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's actually 1.

Multiplication doesn't get priority over division, even when shorthand notation is used.

I calculated 1 in my head and then to ensure I wasn't crazy, plugged it into Gemini, ChatGPT, and Wolframalpha and all 3 confirmed 1

Send readout.

16

Ah, interesting! I was doing it as a math input. And also completely missed the 2(2+2) being different than 2*(2+2) when testing with Gemini and GPT. Interesting!

I explain that in my original post above: it's kind of a cheap shot ambiguity trap TBH.

Folks (understandably but erroneously) assume the short hand notation implies parenthesis around the second half of the equation, changing order odboperations.

You fell into the trap, like 75-85% of people.

And I'd be willing to bet 90% of the people that guess 16 are getting it right accidentally but can't articulate why others guess 1.

For example ๐Ÿ˜‚

nevent1qqswq9eudh4tjusw5p5utw7urchpyq9p24vg6egl0drqwxkza9n5nlspr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqzypa837l7c6xzkw4kpp83lqyryxarkh4yw5pvgyg4jqsp8ejgua3gsqcyqqqqqqg8f5dk2

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚