This is boring af. Like your work but this isn’t it. The “not an ostrich” criteria is whatever but it also seems to ignore and disregard the power of the community’s voice is rallying around that imagery. Bad move.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

*I like your work…

Their are only 2 types of people in this world:

Those with bird brains and those without bird brains.

Just because a group of people think an ostrich logo is it, doesn't make it correct.

I'm sorry but an ostrich won't go mainstream.

This N logo, will purple pill others for generations to come!

tend to agree with corn here đź’ś

excited to see what other alternatives you can come up with, as this is definitely an interesting topic to explore

Been trying things out for months and keep coming back to this. It sure as hell doesn't check aaaaall boxes. But it does the job for me and a large percentage of the builders I work with. Not asking for everyone to use/accept this.

i like the ostrich more than this, and i'm not a fan of the ostrich really

could you make different alternatives of this? maybe there's something to pursue here

You called it “THE LOGO” and said people have been asking for it. That’s a much different claim than simply offering something you suggest people use. Was this funded by publicly donated OpenSats funds? Are there stipulations on how you approach work when it’s funded by those donations?

True, I'm clearly still very much learning my lessons on walking that tight rope as we go.

Thanks for the feedback 🙏

💜🤙

It’s not what the group’s voice shouts for that matters. It’s what icon ultimately gets the most usage. The ostrich is fun and quirky but only the market will decide if a non-ostrich icon like this wins out.

You don’t like it. Got it. You like boring and corporate. Got it. The ostrich is strong for the past year and still seems plenty popular from a birds eye view.

Chill bruh

đź–•đź–•