Yes I think spam is bad and should be fought, we're on the same page there. But I am not allowing any exceptions to the rule. The rule is conflict resolution. What you are calling exceptions are THE ethical rule. People can spam the system claiming to be a victim, but they become aggressors themselves when and where that is egregious, and the rule implies that they need to be fought too. The rule prescribes a system that is self-healing.
Discussion
Doh. You responded to fast. I was still ranting 😂
I know the feeling lol! I'll read the rest now...
It could be that our misunderstanding is of a Positive (my perspective) and yours (Normative).
The legal system is anything but pure, and on the side of corruption.
Your lack of sovereignty is...
disturbing... ❤
I'm a moral realist. My ethics can be proven, it's just damn hard to convince people and would take forever. Regardless you may take note that the positive tends toward my normative system. Maybe I just know something you don't.
Also I have not said that our state-perverted institutions would, as they are now, do what I prescribe with this normative system. Nor do I linger in a vacuum only ever imagining a society that does not at present exist where the institutions overwhelmingly function this way. Your view of me would seem extremely simplistic from your assertion that I have a lack of sovereignty just from having a moral system. That's incredibly naïve.