How about this. We request a feature on #nostr and vote with sats to implement it by the devs. The devs set a minimum ⚡️ price and we #vote with sats ? 🤔

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Bounty is cringe but if we will do it in the right way it make sense.

If the feature is shit devs will remove it and we aren’t upset or angry on them😉

I love your idea and will now reward you sats so that it gets implemented. See you just got proof of concept, congratulations. 👏🏼 Devs let’s go. Make it easy for me to fund good ideas.

YES - love this idea. I would vote so many sats!

I’m in as well 🫡

Boa noite, Brasil ainda está dando seus primeiros passos rumo a criptografia, BTC já é o futuro. Lets Gol...

bro.. i been doing this all along, but solo funding bounties I want to see happen.

Nothing stops anyone from putting up a bounty on their favorite feature ;) Just load up the client's github, find an issue you care deeply about (or create a new one) and make a comment to add your bounty. It's that simple.

I just need to start. I come from LAMP stack and WordPress, so the JS-based stacks are just a little green for me, but I'm getting there.

It’s not forbidden to do #Nostr development with PHP and MySQL too. :)

I guess! I think the client experience would be better in a PWA. Maybe I'll try it...

This is not simple: “Nothing stops anyone from putting up a bounty on their favorite feature ;) Just load up the client's github, find an issue you care deeply about (or create a new one) and make a comment to add your bounty. It's that simple.”

Here is my proposal !

Nostr users complaining about something tagging the devs for example: nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s can we have a such and such feature? jb is setting the price for his dev work and the plebs who wants the feature just vote in the poll that has been crated by jb who will distribute the sats across the devs who will help him or he will implement the feature on his own with ~time frame

And if he doesn’t agree with it - return 21 sat zaps to 100 people ?

Somehow it will be refunded back. Idk if it’s actually possible

I think there's a bounty client that is doing this, or tried doing it, or is planning on doing this, but IMO it's all too convoluted and complicated. People won't pay anything meaningful to get what they want. Only the hardcore supporters will dedicate any meaningful amount of money to a feature they want. I'd guess majority of people who say "I'd pay" won't actually pay.

sounds like one of the first things we need on Nostr is a polling feature.

#amethyst has had polls for a long time now...

I read this differently at first.

Then what we also need is a list of what client side features that need to be moved to protocol layer.

We do have a polling feature, but not many clients have it implemented

Well this make Bitcoin price increase?

#cryptocurrency