Same with trezor sadly

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What’s the deal with Trezor? Aside from the no secure element, I thought they were pretty good. Really thought their Bitcoin only firmware was also a good move. I could be missing something though.

They are using a centralized coinjoin infrastructure provider https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp012aP0ZFA

Okay I remember hearing some controversy on the coinjoin feature. Is that just within Trezor Suite? Like does the signing device itself have anything to do with that? You can use it independently right?

That does have a lot to do with trezor suite. Which means you can’t update the firmware.

I have not tried using the signing device with any other software. Planning to attempt with sparrow

I’ve used it with Sparrow. Not my go-to by any means though. Man I really liked Trezor.

Me

Too

Man

🙇‍♂️

If you don’t use the recently added coinjoin feature, what’s the problem?

You can’t use the trezor suite which is what you use to update the device

looks like we need an alternative

Is Unchained changing the signing device they’re recommending? #[5]

The beautiful thing about multisig is that there is no single point of failure, and that includes the hardware you use.

Right now we support Trezor, Ledger, and Coldcard. The market reality is those three manufacturers have a supermajority of market share.

We likely won't be discontinuing support for any of those in the near future, but we are evaluating adding support for additional manufacturers/devices.

Key point: multisig fixes this.

Thank you sir!

how does multisig fix this?

You could share your seed with Ledger (bad idea) but they won't be able to spend your multisig funds, or even be aware of them.