Is he?
Discussion
I think so. I like nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx
His push re: get off exchanges was helpful to me. Quite.
I’m just trying to understand.
Spread uncorroborated information, to make others look bad, and thereby make myself look good to further a cause I believe in, reinforce my “brand”, and sustain my life.
I think we are all capable of this and we all do it, all the time. We are human.
Don’t let your heroes surprise you, whilst hiding behind a veil of altruism.
We all shit from the same hole, Sats. We are all in this together. In the end, it will be us small-fry plebs that will make all the difference.
Wasn't there another dude who was famously altruistic?
This Odell guy's even more self aggrandizing about the altruism.
How do you earn a living Odell?
I MOSTLY JUST LIVE OFF OF MY BITCOIN SAVINGS TBH.
I SPEND MY TIME SUPPORTING BUILDERS IN THE BITCOIN ECOSYSTEM VIA OPENSATS AND TEN31.
I SAID MY PIECE. TAKE IT AS YOU WILL.
SAYLOR HAS MORE FANBOYS THAN I WAS AWARE OF. HAVE NO IDOLS EVERYONE HAS FLAWS. EVEN ODELL BUT IN THIS SITUATION THE ONE WHO IS IN THE BACKGROUND STOPPING DEALS TO FUND OPEN SOURCE DEVELOPERS IS IN THE WRONG.....
Agree about idols & fanboy shit but this is such a ridiculous point that it had to be called out.
Zero evidence. Bullying ETF’s, as a publicly traded company. Isn’t that illegal?
Ok Jan. Sure. Sure. Makes sense. Sure thing. He’s a power hungry statist. Got it. Manipulating ETF decision making daily. Yup. 👍
Next just say Saylor hurts puppies. Fucking dumb dumb dumb.
It's basic incentives. If Bitcoin is expensive on the base layer, users need banks to hold it for them. This allows all the shady practices of traditional banking to continue. Bank runs are difficult because the network becomes congested and fees climb prohibitively high. Anyone who holds a lot of Bitcoin can become a bank and profit off others. Whether it's Saylor or Swan, BlackRock or Coinbase, this is their incentive.
But Bitcoin is controlled by proof of work, not proof of stake.
Miners are incentivised to maximise on chain transactions, fees x volume. If the fees prevent transactions they would rather scale the base layer.
Users are incentivised to control their own keys to prevent losing funds and having the value of their Bitcoin diluted by fractional reserve banking. They also want the lowest cost nodes, so would rather scale through permissionless scaling solutions.
The block size wars were users vs miners, users prevailed with the UASF for taproot which enabled lightning for scaling, rather than large blocks. There are limits to lightning which is becoming clear.
The next will probably be users vs bankers.
In Bitcoin, be ready to burn your heroes.
Wise that🌅
I WOULD ZAP YOU BUT IM CANADIAN, COMING SOON, STAYING HUMBLE
I WONDER IF I CAN GET ZAPS, IM NOT SURE YET, NOBODY HAS TRIED, IM NEW. THANKS ANYWAY ODEL I LIKE YOUR ATTITUDE
they run Ten31 VC fund.
look at new public miner GRIID. announcement for first public traded Ten31 company that came on the market at $8 then crashes, 300k shares repurchased at $1. waiting on delayed filing now.
https://griid.com/financials/sec-filings/default.aspx
Bitcoin is for enemies axiom- all nodes assumed to be adversarial.