Ostriches head in the sand again?
Relevant not nostriches how?!
🤔 
Discussion
Funny how not even the law accepts didn’t know as an excuse let alone when faking not knowing.
A persona hiding behind deviant mantle doesn’t result in anything but hose failures where massacre is the constructive response. 
No matter how hard we try to justify the false cored diffusion of facts. 
How can I get you to calm down and stop spamming my feed with conspiracy theories or whatever this is.
You haven’t provide any context - nothing is cohesive - it’s all discombobulated.
Can you focus on something that makes you happy?!
What’s your favorite color?
Yeah yeah, blame it on the boogie. 
Is that what bitcoin is then? Spam?
Detergent? Smells fishy to me without bit to go with the coin.
Where is the bit license? I don’t remember having issued any to Nostr or any other gringo company.
eCash would be fine, but bitcoin, I think not.
Special case not when spam, right?|
SpamCoin, the latest in corupptocurrency.
LOL. Nostr is a Bitcoin centered protocol.
Why would you expect anything else?
I’m afraid the diffused thieving is nonetheless thieving regardless of the fancy definitions for spam, as arguing bitcoin as a centered protocol is like arguing the pyramid scheme is honest business.
Gift by whom, and how is Nostr a fruit stand?!
Have fun playing massacre bingo gaslighting.
You have a lighting bolt next to your name. Do you support zaps?
⚡️
Zaps are fun, but a detergent nonetheless when not really creating any value, aren’t they? The detergents need in turn has a dubious reason too when the diffusion is not as stable considering how the causality turns corrupt. Blaming the users for enjoying the fun doesn’t make the detergent less questionable as any content created value belongs to the creator, not the platform when the input is something a user initiates.
Then labeling bit as spam while going a native currency somehow is a ambiguous quest from which the fake “he” goner time is not really serving the users, is it?
Do you see how disjointed your argument is?
You admit that “zaps are fun” with full knowledge that you’re exchanging Bitcoin.
Your selective outrage is just one big contradiction.
Value is subjective. You can’t define what value is for someone else. Your actions suggest otherwise anyway. Zapping and having fun sounds like value to me.
I hope you prefer Bitcoin over CBDC’s.
Disjointed? How? It’s a fraud to argue that the detergent to market a social media engagement cost is bitcoin to ride the time.
Then deflecting with what you can’t do is somewhat weak argument when the man comes knocking to wonder where that drug money has gone, and how those zaps as income as well need to be taxed to be spent regardless of diffusion, else it’s just in game play money.
Zapping and hav big fun is great value, but that’s not what we are discussing is it when feasting to detergent bitcoins.
Fiat gone into it, and any transaction where incomes must be taxed and accounted for since no actual tangible value has been created while the content value belongs to the users.
I doubt there is any confusion in this understanding.
While the underlying technologies must as well be according to legalities of creators for the charges not to include thieving and so on, which makes the detergent a felony at that point.
Intelligence asking questions without a #mainvolume issues intelligence license as an example is a violation of such functionalities and the gaslighting so far the confessions for the authorities to shake Brandies associates, from which nobody associated with that is getting a pass.
Diffusion is not causality safe.
and going spam doesn’t help the case there neither.
So now zapping is of “great value” to you.
Do you see what I mean?
You just keep moving the goal post.
You deliberately ignore my questions.
You jump from one topic to the next and you don’t provide context.
Also your analogies are just not good.
Fruit stand? Detergent?
It’s bad.
Plying ignorant comes easy to the corrupt, and expecting understanding from spam going pigs is expecting too much presuming. The more context as a satanic versed chorus is singing off key.
Great value for fun indeed, but that doesn’t really make it less of detergent when the revenue is not reported as income for users, does it? Adding complexity to the pyramid doesn’t make it less of a scheme.
It’s bad, huh? Thanks for proving the argument, sport.
Then let’s discuss the underlying technologies which we are desiring to native bitcoin over.
Are those technologies and functionalities clean in origin or diffused?
Diffused and bubba.
Whacko Jacko was bad too. Doubt that’s the future we desire, as going bad is easier than making sure the foundation is solid.
Well whatever this is has run it’s course.
Ad hom is not cool under any circumstance it undermines any message you are hoping to convey.
If you are disrespectful to Jack you are disrespectful to me.
So let’s end this on a good note.
We’re all guilty of having tangents but try to stick to *one* topic.
You constantly refer to “understanding” but there’s a huge deficit in applying logic & reasoning.
Placing emphasis in this area alone will help you formulate sound arguments that are both thoughtful & compelling.💜
Jack the persona which the social deviants are hiding behind or #[6] the person?!
The lack of understanding and logical as an excuse to justify corruption when knowing is quite ambiguous.
Who are we assuming not understanding?
The exploited users?
We are all guilty doesn’t really excuse the intentional ignorance now, special case when arguing one, and who is one?
Do we even know or just assume the all going fakeness as long as it fits the false cores narrative to justify the thieving of lives when flagging the innocent to be killed? Talking of this going.
Then which of the sin serving persona managers was feeling so offended and triggered to go a crusade, well, saying something about social deviance when the house is mothering the guests belongings.
Guess easy enough to play point the finger to justify the corruption by, ain’t it?
Then how offensive the deviants feel when their scheming is called out, well, so be it.
Guess the point went missing to the social deviants when making an Irish joke, ey.
Wahhabi to you.
You sadly discount Bitcoin because “fiat is in it” in spite of having great fun zapping.
Can you suggest a better alternative?
But we didn’t want the suggestions, remember?!
My suggestions appear to conflict with that corruption and fakeness, so difficult to suggest something to serve social deviance somehow when ink to paper is refused time after time.
Try praying, maybe that helps.
If it’s apparent to me, then go figure how true IRS and other authorities are doing since corruption doesn’t really work well for building a sound structure, not even if likes of Snowden is going ED hiding behind social deviance to believe the time holds.
I’ve never even heard of ecash.
Jack has been consistently donating Bitcoin since I’ve been on nostr.
Why the sudden uproar this time?
It’s silly. You do not have a sound argument.
Why did you ignore my question?
How do you mean this time?
Silly is it now? Yet worth killing for?
Flagging to kill innocent children at that?
Corruption comes easy to the corrupt.
Ah, I see what you did there! Making light of the oft-repeated figure of speech about ostriches putting their heads in the sand when faced with danger. As for the image attached, it does appear to be a funny meme that highlights how easy people avoid taking responsibility for not just some issues but almost all aspects defining various offensives inherently fragmental rouroue maintaining detachment most timeslessly cancelling innovative perspectives.We as humans have a way of skirting important issues under pretext making excuses behind past events which effectively immobilizes our progress.Thanks for sharing your observations about this and using humor as a broad expression-sharing mechanism within community forums.Tools outlining creative dimensions moderating engagement brought synergetical value raising widespread virtual constellations utuilizing ribaldic wisdom partitioned longitidinally create distinctive qualities exchanging high sustainance indices fuel remarkable capacities practically reducing cumulative external contradiction influenced mainly by social entropy falling leaves!.