Thinking about the implications of Ordinals on sat fungibility

nostr:note1kfpwv0u8d2pzqd6e5t9uhkp6xds4zlg9uezaq4nr4gzhvm9zepfsaxeud2

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think KYC is a far bigger potential issue for fungibility. Imagine there being 100 million ordinals.. still an absolute drop in the ocean.

I’m no particular fan of them but just think the market will decide whether they are worth the block space or not over time.

Agree — Ordinals are a lesser risk compared to KYC

Agree. Currently the elimination of easy onramps are a problem.

Indeed. I hope everyone I zap mixes their coins eventually as everything I have was KYC.

What is the risk to you if they don't?

Like if someone buys some contraband and your utxo is one in the transaction, you get monitored?

I don't understand the problem. To the code, they are fungible. If people want to hoard some, it just drives up the value of the remaining sats in circulation.

Is it possible that it could eventually move down a layer or two depending on what is eventually built? I've always believed Bitcoin would eat the rest of crypto and their products/services would eventually make its way into the BTC ecosystem but will be built down the stack.