nostr:npub1j43pt6t2armkngn84945s3ns6zl68g9xx3w6jg25snanatz6zs6s40jvze
Yeah, I don't think that would fall under this clause, based on my reading of its intention. Perhaps nostr:npub1tc6fesueqqdq0drl9rards3ukuswyd670x74pp8ggge24ect3x6qrcmhfm and nostr:npub1cggwd2qltel960zmd6emshclhdfk2na2k2dcmlwkfhgflfn6at4qy30n34 could chime in and confirm that, though.