Then we will have micro-bits? It will have to be divided further eventually.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

for me it is sats πŸ˜…

micro or mili? i dunno, but we already do that for lightning :)

Either or. Micro-bits and Milibits don't sound as good microsats or milisats.

i really think you're only saying that because it's the term you've heard since you've been in bitcoin. it's familiar to you. i like familiarity too, but when i think about other people, they've heard of the term bits before and because of the definition of the term, they know that they're small, or a part of something. sats is an unknown word and unrelated to bitcoin. at least bit is part of the word, so the association is clear.

I think somethink like the metric prefixes will also work and are more natural but I love sats πŸ˜…

oh man don't say metric prefixes, they make too much sense for the american mind.

I know how to get back to the sats, my friend 😜

How about ΞΌβ‚Ώ? 1ΞΌβ‚Ώ = 100 sats, which is already workable. I also know, that sats is a friction point. So I would only have one name + metric prefix, that many familiar with.

imo the problem with that symbol is 1) i am too dumb to know how to say it or pronounce it and 2) i am also too dumb to figure out how to type it on a keyboard without googling it.

now i am a dumbass from time to time, so i could be wrong here, but i think that symbol is even worse for the masses.

How do you type the btc symbol? πŸ˜‚

πŸ‘€

agree it it so scientific

guide for dummies on how to Β΅:

altgr-M

(or you can just use u…)

dΞΌmmies (I would suggest the u)

semi you are also to scientific πŸ”₯πŸ˜„