Main concern when listening to him was his insistence on the necessity of credit creation “but just in the right areas” as the harbinger of prosperity. Aside from that, quite an enjoyable conversation.

If he hasn’t engaged Bitcoin I think it’s likely from this angle.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That's the main problem I have with his take: he recognizes that money creation is fraudulent, yet suggests that it can still be good since we could theoretically have a banking system that is forced by regulators to only lend money into existence for "productive" investments.