I'm a Knots supporter, but I'm not sure the CP argument does a great job other than scare people. It is definitely a possibility, but in reality it's mostly just NFT and other market making scams, like experimental side chains and whatever else.
That's why I would be more convinced that Back has to follow what his company's suits are pushing in coordination with other partners in the industry.
Adam Back caving into pressure from the suits. Makes perfect sense 🙄 You people will come up with all sorts of ridiculous reasons to convince yourselves that you are right about a problem that doesn't even exist.
So your argument is that he's infallible? Ok
No, not all. But to suggest Adam Back is going to say or do something that he believes would have negative consequences for bitcoin just to satisfy others is ridiculous and shows the depths of your (and your anti-spam cohorts, mostly newcomers to bitcoin following a few loud voices) desperation to justify your arguments.
I actually agree with you on the point that he most likely would not be willing support something he believes to be bad for Bitcoin.
That still doesn't mean he's right, so maybe you could use actual justification instead of appealing to authority?
Useless conversation probably, so I'll leave it at that.
Well your justification for Back being wrong is that he is likely doing because of pressure from others, all I've said is I disagree. You brought it up, not me and you haven't shown anything that could support your theory that he might be wrong or that he is caving to pressure. You are pushing conspiracy theories.
