Calibrating trust takes a lot of discipline, yes. And yes, scientists are wrong all the time. But the point of science is that it's a process of becoming less wrong over time.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Murry me. 🤿 🐳 cc: #[6]. 🫳

💍

Mike said that science is an endless process, like the allegedly ever expanding universe, per scientific research.

Culture, science, politics, and life itself ... all endless processes of constant change. There is no destination.

Agreed. 💯.

🩵! Isn’t that funny? 🛼 Floating on a universe that doesn’t hang. 🫧 Headed nowhere. 🌐 Might as well enjoy the ride. 😼

I guess my question to you is what made you cease to trust the financial experts who said bitcoin was worthless? Or, the environmental experts who say that bitcoin is bad for the environment? What is it about the climate experts that makes you willing to place your trust in them? I’ve also read your points about the fallacy of believing you can predict the future out to 100 years, which I agree without. So how does your beliefs on that subject align with climate modelling that seeks to do just that?