I meant more in regards to what they were doing to seedsigner. But yeah curious to see what the competition does. Would be better if the sats weren’t tied in to the credit

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

🤦🏽‍♂️🤌🏽😂

When I read ur text my dyslexic tarded *ss saw seed vault and I mentally went to the foundation devices 🤦🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️….they really have become my favs

…I have a group of frenz Ive helped initiate their BTC journey who own fairly large sums of BTC and I’ve found myself recommending the foundation products with a few cold card tapsigners for multisig storage (makes geographic dispersion easy) thru sparrow and or nunchuck

The seed signer tech is fascinating but I will be following people with stronger tech backgrounds (like my fav quant) before I dip my toe into it. 🫡🫂

Oh I wasn’t advocating for either one. Though I am very interested in what foundation is doing. It’s just not the first time I’ve heard things like these.

Also is there some credible info out there that coinkite is involved in this?

This is a valid point. Another way of looking at it is who else benefits from this and who else was very vocal against seedsigner? All valid questions to ask imo

No doubt …I’m not jumping in to defend Nvk…he has clearly created animosity among some of his peers…still it’d be nice to see a smoking gun on this particular issue

I think coinkite products will suffer due to inferior quality and lack of consistent innovation compared to products like those produced by nostr:npub1s0vtkgej33n7ec4d7ycxmwt78up8hpfa30d0yfksrshq7t82mchqynpq6j even without vilifying nvk…seems like the abandoned @satslink was the beginning of the end for their innovative cycle…just one idgit’s opinion🤷🏽‍♂️

That satslink thing is crazy to me. “It’s on the bench”. I don’t know man. Do all the marketing. Show a bit of demos and then leave the customer hanging for years. Weak

Yup…my conspiratorial mind went to govt intervention behind the scenes…it seemed like such a great idea…I’d actually ordered 2 of them🤦🏽‍♂️⭕️

I’ll think twice before giving him sats. Keep in mind this wasn’t a payment in fiat. Sats in advance. It’s appreciating but you still get the purchasing power of the fiat amount 2 years ago. That’s gonna leave a sour taste for a while.

Those sats are probably word 1.7-2x the amount when we gave him the deposit.

And best I can tell we have a store credit not a refund🤷🏽‍♂️

No refund on sats 🥲

Should have given a deposit with a cc

Agreed🤌🏽

The smoking gun is him taking market share through FOSS and then licensing up once critical mass was achieved.

HE TOOK THE DEPOSIT MONEY FOR THAT PROJECT AND RETURNED IT AS STORE CREDIT AFTER HE FAILED TO DELIVER ANYTHING. SHAMEFUL SHIT

I really don’t like that. The sats keep going up in value in his pockets meanwhile we get a store credit for a Q

Or just speculation?

I don’t know the seed signer dev or nvk personally so I wouldn’t be able to answer this.

I have strong evidence that links Coinkite and/or NVK as the definitive owners of the domain names.

There are also domains they own relating to other projects, and name-squatting attempts at Nostr and Bitcoin related domains.

nostr:npub132ny9cnwv5rjzw0ppk6ev34gn2n48zjejed2k0kcjxgawxt86mps7f9u95 Semi seems to know more about this

🫡🫂

GM btw my fren🫂🌅

GM Stache friend 🫂