You could advocate for preventing easier spam on Bitcoin — but instead, you’re advocating a change that enables it further. How about leaving it alone? You’re proposing a major change, so the burden of proof is on you. We’re not obligated to follow, and we won’t.
Leaving it alone incentivizes WORSE spam - flooding UTXO set!
Please Login to reply.
Leaving the limit alone I mean. I’m not advocating ossification. I’m advocating a conservative approach when it comes to the changing the Bitcoin code.
Not really, the limit is actively harmful to bitcoin.
Why would the spam stop when it is not left alone?
