Because your β€œfull node” does not actually have any proper indexes for address txn history

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

But why isn't the utxo set enough?

1. Not indexed either

2. Transaction history

I'm suggesting the application simple handling the indexing I understand that has to be a stateful process. There is going to be state stored somewhere. Im suggesting the app store my wallet state without needing to download chain state.

There is just no need to couple my wallet to 800gb of data...

Ah, uh… no app does that I think

They either piggyback off of Bitcoin Core wallet functionality or use the Electrum server

Right... The latter statement is all I'm asking for.

One of a few examples - I'd like to be able to break out a phrase, or a pubkey (whatever format necessary) check the balance (wait a few minutes while scanning utxos) then make it vanish. No connecting to outside servers since I have a copy of the network local. No need to store things on the server and trust the server either.

So electrum sounds good, but see my other comment.

Also, use Fulcrum, it is much faster. Instead of minute it'll be a few seconds usually at most.

Oh! I will take a deeper look!

Why does the website have to be such a meme XD

"lightning is so complicated!" they said. "why can't it be dead simple like bitcoin!" they said πŸ˜‚

That was me. I was they... damn

everything is always more complicated than it seems. thus is life

I'll still die on that hill though. I made a shitty balance watcher in like 50 lines of C# with an rpc connection. LN is retarded. My complaint is it is so simple yet no wallet offers it.

Have you tried CLN?

Yeah... um... that's kind of become my main hot on-chain wallet unfortunately. The LN part I gave up on because I didn't want that much capital in a hot wallet.

You can have a channel with mostly inbound

honestly they're not wrong about lightning... just about bitcoin itself

and i'm going to make it even worse, for the best possible reasons

Ill take that