I find both camps are talking past each other whenever this comes up. Bigger blocks scale better in the sense that they can accomodate more transactions for any given period of time VS Bitcoin. Yes, I also understand that this comes at the cost of less decentralization since it requires more resources to run a node. But there is such a thing as diminishing returns (is a Bitcoin with 50,000 nodes less decentralized and capturable in practice VS 75,000 nodes?)

Given the table below, would you not say Bitcoin is due for even a slight increase in blocksize since technology has improved a lot across the board since it's creation?