I’ve pondered for years the difference, by definition, between faith and delusion.

Both are seemingly the same:

Belief in something you can’t see or touch or prove.

I’ve decided, on a self-talk strategy level, that I’m going to stop using the phrase “have faith in yourself”.

If faith means believing in something you can’t see or touch or prove, this phrase negates the self more than it empowers.

Your life is your proof of self. There’s data to obtain.

Be nakedly honest with yourself about yourself, with the awareness that we literally aren’t capable of complete self-objectivity.

Reflect on your lifetime of truths, patterns, historical metrics.

Safeguard yourself from your own limitations, plan for them. Where you have a strength, sharpen it, exploit it.

If faith and delusion are essentially the same thing, when you say “have faith in yourself” you’re actually kind of saying… delude yourself.

If you see positive historical data sincerely when objectively reflecting, why would you do yourself the disservice of deluding yourself?

And equally or maybe more important: if you do not see positive historical data sincerely when objectively reflecting, why would you do yourself the disservice of deluding yourself? This is limiting.

Don’t have faith in yourself.

Know yourself, actively.

Strategize accordingly.

This is how you ensure ongoing growth and avoid plateauing in life.

Facts > Faith

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Faith is pretending you know something you don’t know. Read Peter Boghossian’s “A Manual for Creating Atheists”

It changed my life.

The self is not compatible with dualistic words

I love your sentiment #[1] but disagree with your premiss. You say faith is belief in something you can’t see and touch, then later you talk about using your past accomplishments as evidence. Those past accomplishments are exactly those things that you saw felt and touched. You can believe in them because you did them and based that you can have faith that you’re capable of at least accomplishing as much or more.

Faith is not delusional, it is evidence based in every respect.

Delusion is what #[2] defines as “p retending you know something you don’t know”.

Not sure why you are thinking that me drawing upon lived experience is the same as me drawing on baseless belief

I don’t. Past experience is the basis for belief.

Your comment is very straightforward. You are using the word faith in a sentence about me looking to proof that I lived and experienced. That is not faith that is proof.

By literal definition, faith is not evidence-based

I understand the word faith is a hard one to accept because of its relationship with religion and saying that having faith is delusional is a fun way to say religious people are delusional without actually saying it. But having faith in your abilities to move forward into the future that is unknown is not the same thing as having faith in a risen savior, a God speaking through a burning bush, or a flying bowl of spaghetti. Though I would encourage us all to look more closely at two out of those three.

You have a lot of good insight. I can tell by looking through your history and your right, we should absolutely lean on our past experiences to move us forward.

You are projecting that intent onto my words. This post is not about religion, nor a way for me to make a statement about religion without saying it. It’s my own reflection on these two words which, so they can apply to religion or not exclusively used by religion.

I appreciate you seeing past your projection, however, when viewing who I am.

Yikes, voice text butchered this lol

👋🏻