Replying to Avatar ManiMe

Private groups are coming to nostr. E2E encryption with no meta data leak. Already implemented in nostr:npub13myx4j0pp9uenpjjq68wdvqzywuwxfj64welu28mdvaku222mjtqzqv3qk . So … this would fit your bill?

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/44.md

Problem is… nostr would still need a user applied marker for “is trusted friend”, because metadata is not available for querying “the people you engage with privately”. Though… a smart client could offer user option to “mark trusted friends based on your private messages” or something.

As I said, I don't like the idea of a Nostr-centered implementation. It would be a shame to artificially limit something like that. "WOT" means more than just Nostr. And Nostr isn't the end-all, be-all of wisdom. One should look ahead when it comes to such an important standard.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

But it’s already happening on nostr. So we need to come up with some implementation that doesn’t suck.

Than why are we talking about it? Maybe it should have another name, Web of Trust is a bit misleading. This term was used before.

I know. Thanks for your thoughts.