Second amendment is to guarantee the first amendment (free speech). This allows the citizens to criticize government freely associate with others and petition government for redress of wrongs etc. It also serves as a strong check against government overreach and abuse of force on its citizens.✌️💜

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Everyone keeps telling me that, but we have that here, even without the 2nd Amendment.

And Europeans have ovethrown their governments, repeatedly and regularly, including in Western and Central Europe, within my lifetime, without the 2nd Amendment. Sometimes even completely peacefully.

Just finished questioning the bot and it gave me this:

• James Madison (Federalist No. 46):

“The advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation… forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition.”

So, the 2nd amendment is preemptive. By disincentivizing oppressive ambitions, government overthrow is not necessary in the first place.

You don't need weapons to effect a change in government.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velvet_Revolution

> So, the 2nd amendment is preemptive. By disincentivizing oppressive ambitions, government overthrow is not necessary in the first place.

The US concentrated 120,000 Japanese descendants (mostly citizens) in camps during WWII. Apparently the disincentive is not very strong.

More guided research (cheating?) from the bot below.

Regarding the Velvet Revolution, communism was already in decline and, crucially, Gorbachev had signaled that it would no longer use military force to keep satellite states in line.

So, the Czechoslovak Communist Party knew Moscow wouldn’t send tanks like in 1968 (Prague Spring). Without that backing, their willingness to violently crack down was weaker.

So peaceful worked but, at least partially, by coincidence.

Also read that during Prague Spring a 20 year old named, Jan Palach, committed suicide by setting himself on fire in protest.

To more directly respond, perhaps the second amendment is about preventing change, rather than effecting it?

Yes, perhaps.

You absolutely do not have freedom of speech in the EU...

You should read our constitution if you’re going to be so critical.

The first amendment is a protection of the right bestowed by God to speak freely.

The second amendment is a protection of the right bestowed by God to carry a weapon.

The government doesn’t give us rights. God does. These amendments are in place so that the government has a harder time taking them away.

The language is “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

And

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”