No relay side pls gawd no
Discussion
Not a normal relay. A small, walled garden.
Like, having one with a discussion board, and making it invite-only or paid, through AUTH and encryption, or something.
If you wanna put that relay in client then cool I'm in. But no centralized data powers. Pls
You are wrong. Relays are private property, they must be walled necessarily.
Respectfully, so is my data. Don't touch it. Don't care if you invented the system. Centralizing data authority undoes all your work. Censoring at choke points breaks the promise of freedom. But whatevs. I guess you will find out eventually.
I'll use it til u censor me and then will leave. Social media in this format only has a cpl years to run anyway. Am really tryingvto help you guys realize that you are rebuilding what you claim to hate.
I was in enterprise tech throughout 90s 2000s 20010s I have watched this happen repeatedly and for the same stated reasons. Safety.
But hey am jus cartoon frog. What do I know right?
Yes, you are just a cartoon frog.
But can you clarify your position? You think relays should all be free and open and accept anything that anyone publishes to them?
I think relays should be handling encrypted data only and not touch my data. I think that all content controls should be at client. I think that load management and scalability does not require you to look at my data. I think that once the power to censor is created it will be abused. I wish federated identity and notes had been a core design consideration.
None of it matters though. In the end centralizing is easier so that's what will happen.
No hate but I know when a party is winding down. This party promised freedom and is now announcing the curtailing of that freedom for safety and service provider convenience.
Sorry if tone off or typos. Am at beach. I am no ones enemy but I see great danger approaching in familiar garb.
Be well
You didn't answer my question.
Private property governed as described above. I answered the question. You know I did. You are better than playing word games. You could have politely said thank you and walked away or addressed the issues raised as an answer to question. You chose snark. Why?
You didn't respond to the points in my note jaf
Tottally agree Pepe. Nostr really should work more like (PgP) email, which was and still is an excellent decentralized communication tool. My local email client controls my spam, I set the terms, not my email provider. It works just fine, I don't want anyone else (eg google) to decide what is or is not for me to receive and read (gmail has been trying to break this system, so I won't use it, Nostr clients/relays must not follow the same path). Spam is a pain, but it does not need to be controlled centrally.
And this note see. Why are you straw manning me? I did not say those things.
What is the advantage of Nostr over Twitter? Nostr is a public forum, if it's relays are censored and controlled by unknown entities then it isn't really much different to a centralised platform like Twitter. More precisely it becomes another mastodon, with all its limitations.
You can run a relay.
i do. I run 3. again why do you feel the need to answer so ascerbically? no one here is your enemy and your communication style makes dialog difficult
So its more like mastodon. With all the same limitations. Since anyone can run a mastadon server also. And it seems that both Nostr and Mastadon will require you to do so if you don't want to be censored. I though Nostr was doing something different to mastodon in terms of censorship. I guess not.
Your client is your garden . it needs higher fences and a guard