Holding any culpability for voters is unfair because people are essentially voting under duress.

If you don't participate, other people will vote to take your stuff/rights. So you're forced to vote out of self defense.

Alt: the theory of authority is that the gov is acting on "the will of the people". If no one voted, they can't claim to have the consent of the governed

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This is only true if one side asymetrically stops voting, giving the other side a decisive victory over the other.

How to improve the system is a difficult question; is it done by participating (and hoping the person elected makes a change) or is it done by "voting out" and building a better alternative?

Tangent, but You may find this interesting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf7ws2DF-zk