Until about the year 1500 AD, a majority of humankind had always lived outside of States.
That is not the same as lawless, of course - band and clan societies have decentralised legal systems. Xeer and Pashtunwali are used to the present day.
Historian James C. Scott has written some thought-provoking books on non-State peoples:
Regardless it wont work. We will always have our Master as Jesus Christ. God will always be our law giver and Ruler. Anarchy isnt a concept that has any power or substance.
Tolstoy agreed with you 100% on Jesus.
He was an Anarchist as well as a devout Christian. He didn't believe obedience to earthly states was compatible with Salvation.
Jesus is the son of God. That is not anarchy. He is the Law. He fulfilled the Law of Moses.
We are not Jesus. We are not the Law. Anarchy is not ours.
There's no Caesar in the blockchain. Who do you render Bitcoins unto, other than by your own free will?
Not applicable
That was Tolstoy's conclusion too. Of course, they didn't have bitcoin then.
Here's a translation of his actual book: https://web.archive.org/web/20120205200941/http://www.kingdomnow.org/withinyou.html
I don't agree with all of it, but then, I have always been, in Max Weber's formulation, "religiously unmusical".
Also careful with wiki articles like that. Movements stsrt very easily, that doesnt mean anarchy is part of Christianity. You could have a wiki article on Christian terrorism. Doesnt give it any substance.
I have met more than a few Christians who have ended up believing Christian Anarchy is exactly what Jesus intended. 🤷🏽♀️ I don't disagree, I just lean Libertarian Voluntaryist for practical reasons.
god law, yes. but we are talking about man made law that is far from anything godly.
