This is probably an unpopular opinion, but I actually don't think the referral/ad model is that bad of a revenue model for products like a social network, HOWEVER, that's only if the ads don't involve:

1. Data collection on the user in order to target the ads

2. Excessive frequency of ads

3. Disruptive placement of ads in the interface that get in the way

I think at their best, ads that are done correctly and don't do those 3 things are essentially a product discovery/recommendation tool for users that also allow their nostr client to remain free.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Thanks, I definitely agree. Unfortunately, once you introduce ads, there's always a slippery slope towards data collection and more disruptive ads. But as long as the software is open source, I suppose it can be cloned and cleaned.

Yeah that's the beauty of open protocols like Nostr. Clients that misbehave can be forked and have the crappy parts removed, or users can just switch to a dif client altogether and still keep their social network and profiles.

If your note is unencrypted, it is only a matter of time before it is data mined.

All unencrypted notes are fair game for anyone and everyone to mine and abuse. You should assume an adversarial model rather than one built on good will.

The problem comes with the model. If you're tied to the model and your (paying) customers ask for better results for their money (targeting) it's hard to say no.

There will also be some players that will just do the features that attract the advertisers and give them what they want.

Similar to Gresham's Law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gresham%27s_law , your good intentions will drive you out of business or to the margin.

It's not black and white but doing it right takes some guts and firm beliefs (and maybe lowered expectations).

OpenAI is the latest example. AI for all non-profit flipped when the opportunity was too good to miss.