Why not just list out three of his core points (as in the points he's expanded upon at length and clearly takes seriously) and refute them one by one? Or else mute him?
Discussion
He doesn’t deserve to be taken seriously at this point.
Why not? He makes some interesting and arguments and he clearly knows the technical underpinnings of Nostr. Seems like a fun debate.
He has nothing to contribute, which is why i muted him, which is probably why he is mad.
You’ve never dealt with a narcissist I take it? He’s not in it for a good faith discussion or debate. He’s here for attention. He’s loving every second of the abuse. He gets off on it. The only attention he will get from me is mockery and then ignoring him once I’m bored enough.
If both sides were making reasonable and well-researched arguments then I don't know how you'd tell the difference between a good faith debate and a bad faith debate?
Maybe you want to bite on one of these?
"Nostr has no meaningful comparison to Bitcoin, which entirely different as a system."
"Relays are just servers. They are no more "decentralized" than traditional web servers, which you can also run yourself."
"Relays fall into the same legal and moderation requirements as any cloud server or social media website. If caught failing to comply, then legal trouble."
