Free-market enthusiasts like to point out that #capitalism is really good att generating wealth. Sure, but that's not the main priority. Those are to 1) survive without messing up the environment, 2) feed, house, clothe, educate etc. everyone, globally. Capitalism counteracts these higher priorities.
Discussion
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqxn93y37uhtugjz523y402pmuzct9f2dtspf6cz3s44jwx4e4tk9qx7h94j Also capitalism isn't really all that great at generating wealth either when it's left unfettered. Unfettered capitalism has done the literal *opposite* of generating wealth in the west in recent decades. It's made a few *individuals* very wealthy, but on the whole western economies have done very badly at even keeping people at the levels they were at in the '70s, not to mention expanding their economic situation.
And the fewer fetters on the capitalism, the worse the outcomes.
Well, we do not have «unfetted» capitalism. We have a system of centrally planned rates with monetary expansion that caters to a few cantillionaires close to the money printer. That does not sound like capitalism to me.
Do you want to propose something that is better? Many have tried, but ended up with authoritarianism.
To some extent I agree with you, as I see it as a tough job to price in negative externalities into the market. And I’d like to do so without introducing violence.