The reason Bitcoin’s returns are outsized is because it’s *being monetized.*
But none of that changes that this cannot happen to the economy as a whole.
Imagine:
If there are only 10 people in the economy all using sound money, but they all just “hoard” the money they have, they do nothing, they eat and consume nothing (because you can’t keep your savings by earning nothing and still consuming stuff), & they just wait, then no one’s money will ever grow in purchasing power (it will actually fall). Because the amount of stuff and production they can buy is essentially nothing… since no one is making anything.
Now if among those same 10 people they are all working and producing more than they are consuming (they are *continuously* saving), then they are all adding more into the economy than they are taking out (that’s literally what savings means). Meaning the economy is growing in capital goods and consumer goods consistently. In this case, whatever they save *does* go up in purchasing power, because the amount of things available to buy is going up.
The latter is what saving money really means. The former (that everyone will hoard money and get rich at once) is just an impossible fairy tale that the political class has drilled into everyone’s heads but has no basis in reality.
So no, we cannot, collectively as a society, have everyone do nothing, earn nothing, and produce nothing, while money increases in purchasing power, these are axiomatically mutually exclusive.
In other words “buy and hodl” isn’t a statement to “do nothing.”
It’s literally a statement to **run a surplus always.**
We have to get out of the fiat mindset when it comes to savings and debt:
• Savings simply means producing more than you destroy/consume.
• Debt simply means you consumed/destroyed more than you created.
One of these grows society on net, the other destroys society on net. It’s literally that simple.
Thread collapsed