I am fighting for the right of every woman to be fully-dressed in something feminine without being discriminated against.

A pretty frock is not something wicked. You do not have to hide in your homes.

Wear an indecent amount of fabric. Let the hemline out decadently and add a shamelessly elegant collar.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

👊💯🤔👆

Nothing wrong with being modest.

Modest is the new immodest.

Notorious, defiant, rebellious modesty. Not for the faint of heart.

Liberation from the Tyranny of the Emancipation Miniskirt and Leggings-As-Pants.

This is even better😑

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=496x741&blurhash=%5E%7EMj%3Agj%5B%7EqofayWB%25MfQRjj%5BRjWB%25MWBRjofM%7Bj%5Bt7fPWBj%5Bayayayj%5BWBj%5Bt7WBfQayayj%5Bofj%5Bj%5BayayfQofj%5BfQj%5Bayayofayofjtayayayj%5B&x=30eea453e3ee9dca72b615f1ec92c241901b4ee07949bc149123380c2413fc85

Your mens' crosses are not my mens' crosses.

OK, You did not fall into my trap :))

Here’s my take FWIW, humans can be intimidated by human suits (looks) no matter what one is wearing.

Just as it doesn’t matter what a human is wearing they can be preyed upon.

Why this is a fight for some is beyond me?

Yes, there's little statistical correlation between how a woman dresses and her likelihood of being sexually harrassed or assaulted.

Unfortunately, we can't modest our way out of that problem because immodesty doesn't cause it.

Agree that beautiful women are intimidating, even in a potato sack or jeans and a baggy band T-Shirt. Or a baker's apron and covered in flour.

Or, so I've heard.

All the more reason to wear something pretty. There's no camouflage, so you might as well enjoy yourself and spend the afternoon stroll feeling like the wood nymph from Violet Vale.

Honestly now, are you Mrs Laserhodl?

You're the third npub who's asked me that, but we're married to other people.

Intended as a compliment, in terms of aligned values.

Yeah, thanks.

He seems to have wandered off..