Nostr Web Client

If you can’t have a conversation without cheap insults and dishonesty, then how could you possibly expect me to take you seriously?

I’ve gone out of my way to give DCs a lengthy and fair shake. But the proponents consistently refuse to discuss trade offs. Say anything about them negative, admit the obvious fact that there ARE trade offs, and suddenly I’m just an INfLuEnCoOr.

I’d be vastly more likely to continue discussion if I had any reason to think the opinion in favor of it were *sober,* but the amount of hand waving and “they can just run light clients” as if this completely negates the numerous issues I brought up is what makes this conversation impossible.

Anyone who bothered to listen to my show and the ridiculous number of episodes I’ve dedicated to going back and forth on this would know the truth. But if a cheap opinion of *me* is the best thing you have for arguing against my points, then there’s no progress to be made here.

I have no reason to continue a conversation with someone who can’t make a point without elementary school name calling.

Thanks anyway, hope you have a good day regardless.

j 2y ago

Unless "influencer" is an insult, I don't think I used any insults or name calling. So, I don't know what you're talking about.

I like your show tho, so keep it up. The Thunder episode was good.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Guy Swann 2y ago

I have a hard time believing that last sentence wasn’t meant to be entirely derogatory - But regardless I’m glad you liked the Thunder Network episode.

Like I’ve said probably 100 times before, DCs are an interesting addition to the architectures of sidechains, but they simply aren’t a panacea, and it bothers me that people act like they are. Makes me feel like I’m not able to get honest, adversarial thinking discussion.

j 2y ago

Fair enough.

Agree that more adversarial discussions is a good thing for everyone.

mleku 2y ago

what exactly is interesting about adding another blockchain onto a blockchain? never heard of Cosmos? you can have whole webs of them if you want. probably you never heard of them and that sorta suggests there's nothing useful really going on.

mleku 2y ago

finality and atomic swaps built in don't fit well with probabalistic finality either, it's already slow af with cosmos tokens crossing between chains, needs at least one hour and even then. someone made finalizer widgets for bitcoin at one point i think.

it's really a dead end, people have been up and down that road at least 3 times already, why now? probably to pump someone's bags.

and as a result of hearing mr guy swann saying affirmative things about old hat says to me there is nothing more worth hearing from him.

j 2y ago

lol, how would you "pump someone's bags" with drivechains? The whole point is to use Bitcoin.

This is just more of the "shitcoins on Bitcoin" nonsense.

As far as Cosmos is concerned, no, I don't know anything about it, I will look into it, thanks. But your point about cross chain swaps not working is silly. Already works today, and there's many account-less exchanges that offer them. The main problem is you'd have to trade your Bitcoin for some shitcoin (except for submarine swaps which are great) so I wouldn't use most of them.

Guy Swann 2y ago

Agreed. The incessant “shitcoins on bitcoin” remarks really misses the whole point. None of what happens on the sidechain matters to the main chain, this is true for literally any of them. All of them could create as many arbitrary tokens if they wanted to.

All that matters is what’s happening on the actual Bitcoin timechain, and how ownership on Bitcoin is determined. Is it a federated multisig, or is it a time locked channel, or is it a hash locked balance? Everything else is completely irrelevant, imo.