I respectfully disagree brother.

Every man has a religion. The question isn’t if you worship but what or who you worship. The state often acts like a false god, demanding loyalty and punishing those who don’t comply, but lumping biblical Christianity in with it is a mistake.

The state rules through coercion. Christ’s kingdom is built on truth and redemption, not force. The state comes and goes, using deception and power to maintain control. God’s word stands forever and doesn’t need manipulation to sustain it.

The problem isn’t religion itself but false religion, whether that’s the worship of the state, self, or any other man-made system. Rejecting God doesn’t make someone free, it just means they will serve something else. Everyone has a master. The only question is which one.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

> Every man has a State. The question isn’t if you are a citizen but where you are a citizen.

> The problem isn’t the state itself but bad states, whether that’s the worship of the Reds or the Blues, or adherence to the wrong financial system (Socialism, Capitalism, etc.). Rejecting the State doesn’t make someone a sovereign individual, it just means they will end up the citizen of another State. Everyone has a country. The only question is which one.

Good, I can agree with that. That’s statism. Now go for Christianity.

I quoted you on Christianity and merely swapped out some terms.

That's my point: the logic works exactly the same.

That is not intellectually honest because the State enforces its authority with violence on the humans residing within its claimed territory while Christ’s kingdom is completely voluntary and without borders.

Why would one want to escape from the borders of the territory the state has claimed? Wouldn't they be foregoing all the benefits and protection of the state?

Not if the state has turned to tyranny. Which all states do.

God does not turn to tyranny since the resurrection of Christ according to the Christian view