How would Nostr do in this comparison chart?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’m too lazy to do the whole thing, but if i weren’t, this would go in the first cell (aka spotty)

Never fails to make me laugh 😂👌

chaotic or stable leadership? 🤣

Nostr core dads are highly stable geniuses

Yes

All green except for the first one I'd say

For Nostr, one would want to tease apart which questions are about client functionality and which are about adoption. The client functionality questions will have different answers depending on the client, whereas the adoption questions are probably answerable.

Ain’t nobody got time for that. 😉

nostr is the horse I’m riding.

“Relationship with journalists”

Leaves a lot of subjective interpretation

…Everyone is a journalist

put on wikipedia asap

What is T2? 😅

I second this question

The one where the machine tricks John Connor into thinking it’s his friend.

Why is Nostr not in that comparison? :)

We should state the criteria for decentralization in a manner that protects users from censorship both from external actors (including states) and from server administrators. In that sense, Nostr is superior to all because the end user holds the own nsec private key, which represents their account identity and everything tied to their account, most importantly their social graph. With this custody, users are free to migrate to other relays, and maintain their state. Not so for other services.

Why are we talking about news watchers?

tbh, nostr and its clients are not stable enough when a user load posts. Sometimes posts and followers do show up. You are also not sure if your posts have reached your followers.

How would internet do in comparison?

In orange and purple.

this seems like a useful chart to redo, there are quite a few changes to be made...

I just redid this chart a bit, needs some more but figured I would start somewhere