is Israel a satellite state of the US, or is the US a satellite state of Israel?
Discussion
Started as a satellite of ours, slowly became a rogue department working with the deep state. That's my latest guess
It was always meant to be a military base, not of any country but of the elites that control those countries. Rothschild made Israel. Originally a German family, then British. No allegiance to any state. A banking family that were/are behind the world wars and beyond
Started as a satellite of the UK (they openly recognized it as such)
Now a satellite state of the US
Deep state isn't really as much of a factor as the countries themselves - the voter base in the US controls the deep state and the non-deep-state of the US and Israel
I defer to your expertise here. Was just throwing out my latest hunch
yeah could be true. I got no idea beyond but it seems likely that it was a strategic deal post WWII. Why exactly? Not sure. Maybe they bankrolled the US.. maybe the US wanted the influence over that side of the world for empire building.. maybe both. Maybe neither 🤷
Israel is a very tiny land, and the Jewish banking cartel was created as a global response to world war 2, so the Israelis didn't really have anything to bankroll the US
The middle east is oil rich and it seems like simply: American voters want low gas prices and don't care about human lives, so the US collectively wants oil wars and regional instability in the Middle East
Neither.
The US is a satellite state of Israel
Israel is a satellite state of the US
i think we are seeing the confluence of a few different things
i think the lens of "water wars" is a good one re: entire region
i think the offshore oil lens is a good one
my frontrunner is canal theory
evergreen's ever given (cháng cì lún) running aground in the suez on 23 March 2021 was proof of concept re: what this chokepoint looks like while out-of-commission for only 6 days. tied up goods worth an estimated US$9.6 billion per day. i dont have that number of the estimated cost of the knock-on effects caused by ever given in total. (is hard proof of the logistical "necessity" of genocide in gaza one such knock-on effect?)
plans for a competing canal, the vision that this canal can compete with the suez keeping prices in check & while providing redundancy as resilience, solving the problem completely,
no longer "A Single Point of Failure" between the med & the red sea, goes thru gaza. need a permanently stable ethnically cleansed gaza to fund a project like that.
it is very possible my "bare minimum" bar for finding a logic, however twisted, to 'justify' agreement for this from a business standpoint is a lot higher than i estimate it would have to be to 'justify'
to me: nothing on this planet
nothing in this whole world
justifies genocide
genocide is unjustifiable
but my bare minimum logic with my bar in the hell beneath hells may still be with eyes of generosity on my end beyond my fathoming. i truly have no idea. for all i know there is a guy somewhere who flips a quarter after taking some bets & that settles it & then he goes back to constructing his alligator bone chandelier.
Does anybody care?