Monero offers *good* default privacy guarantees.
There are technologies that protect sender, receiver and amount. Understanding those, users can make decisions.
Its homeslice here who's claiming easy opsec on a transparent chain "because liquid exists"
Yea... I didn't say that. Your fee fees are very hurt because your orange coin sucks. I get it. I'd be mad too if I was down 50% for the year.
Monero been around 150 for like three years now bro. I got in under 60 USD so feeling pretty good about it.
And you still haven't provided any actual information about the supposed invincible opsec possibilities on bitcoin.
Just "trust me bro"
You're too focused on currency to understand OPSEC
Monero users have opsec. Monero is just one part of it. Those that don't though are still protecting themselves unlike bitcoin users that leave a big gaping hole to be filled by dicks and sundry.
This is true users of any currency have OPSEC. Except for CBDCs of course.
Pointing out that currency opsec is just an aspect of the greater opsec picture,
doesn't excuse you from explaining yourself when you assert bitcoin is fine and monero is unnecessary.
But you don't really have anything to say about it at all, do you?
Exactly. All things equal the same user would have a more difficult time maintaining their opsec as a whole by using Bitcoin vs Monero. An inconvenient truth they don't acknowledge.
All things equal, they work the same for opsec. One of them stores value well... An inconvenient truth for you.
One coin maintains forward and backwards privacy by default.
and one doesn't.
You are either lying to us, or to yourself.
Either way its misinformation that some peoples lives depend on.
Get your shit together.
Can you tell me who Satoshi is? Since Bitcoin is so bad for privacy?
What does anonymity have to do with privacy? Maybe learn the difference. Satoshis is anonymous but his transactions are completely public.
Thanks for making my argument for me. Anonymity is superior to privacy.
"...Since Bitcoin is so bad for privacy?"
Your whole claim was that Bitcoin is private. It's not.
Now you're switching up your argument to anonymity (Bitcoin isn't even truly anonymous, it's weakly pseudonymous). A blockchain that is anonymous AND private would be ideal for OPSEC. Lack of privacy weakens your ability to stay anonymous.
You're being dishonest it's not the same. One makes things more difficult one makes them easier.
SoV has nothing to do with OPSEC or private transactions. Bitcoin can be $1 trillion per coin and still suck for privacy. In fact, it's a bad point for you to bring up because the only real time-tested SoV we have is gold which is private. Multiple millennia vs ~15 years
It’s actually down pretty bad over the last 4 years in bitcoin terms. Using fiat as your denominator will distort your actual value 
Now price it in BTC. Oof.
You maxis love a fiat chart when it fits your narrative don't you?
This is measured in BTC not fiat. I already told you I don't use fiat.
Look this isn't hard
That is the USD PRICE OF BITCOIN.
(XMR/USD)/(BTC/USD) is USD denominated.
Obviously.
Its retarded y'all wave that around when you like but spend thw rest of your time shitting on fiat.
What that chart measures is *relative* speculative investment. Mostly by VC and fiat institutional degens.
So cool, BTC has attracted that crowd and you get off on your increased fiat-equiivalent purchasing power.
Kinda weird flex for supposed "freedom money" but I'm used to it.
