The judge’s name is known by the public more than the right the judge is supposed to be protecting.
Good men can stop this. But they’ll probably vote harder next time instead.
The judge’s name is known by the public more than the right the judge is supposed to be protecting.
Good men can stop this. But they’ll probably vote harder next time instead.
The only way is peaceful non-compliance.
Use nostr instead, etc
Yeah, good technology and activities and processes are what stop bad men and bad processes. It's not just a simple game of consciousness against consciousness in some unlimited conflict. The criminals and the do-gooders alike have constraints. Opting out with censorship resistant tech and beneficent incentive structures, that stops this/spreads the ideas of good rules, not charismatic-seeming rulers.