Most people only consume online. Being censored is not an issue for them because they don’t speak in the first place. To position a protocol as censorship resistant is to appeal to a small minority.
I think a lot more people care about having to put up with crappier services at ever higher prices due to platform lock in. Nostr addresses this.
Maybe the trick to raising consumer concern about censorship is to remind them that their access to unapproved content is being restricted? Then again maybe that would only condition them to accept censorship?
nostr:note16cx8p2vxw3qlj5knau3qzdggkatazdxy4nhzz4eh5y486ywm6lqq5hv9z0
Good call. 100% accurate call. 99% are consumers.
Such a good observation as to why the censorship piece is not the hook
Good take ser
