Today I spent an hour writing some code I had already written but had forgotten.
I only realized when GitHub rejected my commit because it already had the same stuff in a different commit from a month ago.
Today I spent an hour writing some code I had already written but had forgotten.
I only realized when GitHub rejected my commit because it already had the same stuff in a different commit from a month ago.
classic fiatjaf
what was the diff?
playing your greatest hits
lol i had something similar when i was doing my thesis, did some data crushing and visualised it in a table for the method section.. when i was done i found a doc also named 'table' where i already did that.. spent like 2-3h on it
felt so dumb😂
nostr:npub1getal6ykt05fsz5nqu4uld09nfj3y3qxmv8crys4aeut53unfvlqr80nfm zap 1000
^
nostr:npub1xv8mzscll8vvy5rsdw7dcqtd2j268a6yupr6gzqh86f2ulhy9kkqmclk3x zap fiatjaf's note on my behalf using nwc
Wait, what's this? What do i have to do to set this up?
Not a thing, yet, but a simple way to bypass Apple restrictions
Could ln.tips allow a zap directly to a noteid?
nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg zap to note with lntip bot?
Cool idea, I'll have to think about it
Yes, this would be acceptable. I like and dislike nostur, would prefer to avoid it
🫂
😂
Did any of the new code come out better than the original?
🥴😵💫🤙
Ah, boring. I thought it would end in the commit hash matching.
Getting old sucks, ain't it? 🤣
This happens to me with books. Particularly “classics” Get to the denouement and realise I’ve already read it 🦭
This is a glitch in the Matrix. You wrote that code in a different dimension. 😁
being consistent is good!
I've done this with entire projects. 🤦