I’m sure all 8 billion people on earth are going to verify their hardware wallet’s open source code themselves instead of trusting other people that say it’s good lmao this must be the orange pillers rand0 is always talking about

Obviously it’s better to have the code be verifiable. No one is arguing that, that wasn’t even my point. I don’t even use ledger, but I’m not a mindless drone and can recognize that at a certain point if their customers don’t get rugged people need to give credit where it’s due, or at least stop the knee jerk FUD. Buy as I have learned that time frame is never. Some people will always hate the opposite team no matter what

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's about the ability to do so, that's what keeps people honest. Don't make hyperbolic bullshit scenario arguments. It's dumb.

After reading more through this thread, the main point was about nostr:npub14mcddvsjsflnhgw7vxykz0ndfqj0rq04v7cjq5nnc95ftld0pv3shcfrlx endorsing a product to noobs that might potentially get them rugged so he can pad his pockets. Just like he did with Compass Mining. It's a shitty thing to do.

Way too far in weeds.

Fuck closed source for your money saving technology. Stop recommending shit like that when there are much better alternatives. Like a lot more that are way better.