Yep, it seems obvious, yet there's a strong culture of denial among Bitcoiners. I suspect that the SEC approvals of the ETFs might have actually been a "conspiracy" between regulators and fiat kings to attempt to rehypothecate Bitcoin out of existence.

Tell me why I'm being an idiot?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Conspiracy implies an agenda driven central intelligence.

I'm going for the multiple cheap huckster narrative 😂

Fair enough. They're definitely cheap hucksters, but the fact that the regulator shows no interest in regulating, seems to suggest conspiracy too.

I just watched the start of a YouTube video about the Titanic sinking, suggesting that J.P. Morgan organised it all in order to drown his 3 biggest rivals who would have opposed his plans for the Fed.

He was due to be onboard but became ill, so missed the boat, only to die a year later from a heart attack.

Apparently the earth is flat.

The best way to hide real conspiracies is to drown them in a sea of fake ones.

Occam's razor teaches us that mostly, people are stupid 😂

I’ve flown Concorde, so technically I’m an astronaut, except I got to quaff champagne and down foie gras instead of the paste shit they have to eat 😂

You're not an idiot. You're just speculating with zero evidence.

True. I suppose people invented gods as a way to explain the unexplainable, so same same.

I guess I should accept that the reason for the current Bitcoin price action is simply a case of supply meeting demand. The whales are off-loading.

I don't understand how ETFs will take btc out of existence. Could you explain?

Just a stupid theory, but if they keep rehypothecating into paper BTC, then how would it be any different from fiat. Any company that can't or won't prove reserves should not be trusted.