As if transparency matters for them! They need those cantillions.

I see no problem in people using fractional reserve lightning. When they want to buy something in real life (not fractional reserved) they would have to pay on chain bitcoin, so their financial games would only work internally between fractional reserve lightning channels.

Once they try to settle onchain the will need 10times of the fractional reserve lightning "Bitcoin" .

So basically the playfield is levelled for everyone and cantilliinaires only have am advantage when they only deal with other fractional reserved entities.

I hope you understand what I mean, as I am not a native english speaker.

Not sure what you're implying? If in response to me I use liquid and lightning btc layer 2 solutions. I'm a fan of lnbits lnurls in general. I also use several other crypto layer 2 chains for ethereum. I use my bitcoin not just hodl and I teach many face to face sessions on using btc.

I'm replying to the article which is essentially dealing with layer 2 compatability and as far as lightning on top of liquid.

Normies barely get moving on chain btc to lightning. They have trouble understanding a hot online lightning wallet vs on chain wallet with recovery phrase. I also don't think hiding the complexity like muun wallet does is a good thing. Others have written on that about muun.

As I said, adding complexity while beneficial for flexibility and the other benefits mentioned in the blog post is a good thing, it stays in the realm of btc nerds and not good for normies. Tell a normie that their payment to the website that only accepts on chain BTC has to settle through lightning, then liquid depeg or atomic swap, to BTC before it gets paid while accumulating fees along the way. Then tell them they should just have another wallet for on chain transactions. And they should use accordingly lightning, lightning on liquid, or on-chain depending on where they are sending so you want people to adopt bitcoin or just turn it into a niche product for nerds?